Among ordinary Japanese, the spending is widely disparaged for having turned the nation into a public-works-based welfare state and making regional economies dependent on Tokyo for jobs. Much of the blame has fallen
on the Liberal Democratic Party, which has long used government spending to grease rural vote-buying machines that help keep the party in power. [emphasis added]
Sound familiar? Suppose we paraphrase Fackler(changes in italics):
Among ordinary Americans, the spending is widely
disparaged for havingturned the nation into a public-works-basedwelfare state and making regional economies dependent on Washington for jobs. Much of the blame has fallen on the liberal Democrat Party,which has long used governmentspending to grease rural, city, and
suburban vote-buying machines--such as unions,
Acorn, the ACLU,the NAACP, La Raza, etc.--that help keep
the party in power.
Will ordinary Americans (or, as Dan Rather used to call us, “work-a-day Americans”) be as smart as “ordinary Japanese”, and realize what a colossal power-grab this so-called stimulus package is? I am not optimistic.
5 comments:
Dear SmarterThanCongress,
Japan's "Liberal Democratic Party", despite it's name, is actually the conservative party. No joke, they are most comparable to our country's Republicans. A simple Wikipedia search will reveal this in the first sentence on the party's page. But if you don't trust Wikipedia, search a little further and you'll get the same description of the LDC on any other website.
That said, the difference between Japan's failed stimulus package and ours, is that Japan has almost no natural resources and therefore had to invest in what would become the late '90s tech bust. America's stimulus bears no resemblance to Japan's.
Also. www.bafflegabbed.com, coming very soon to a computer near you!
Oh yeah? Did you read the part where it says, "grease...vote-buying machines that help keep the party in power?"
While that's certainly sad to see. I don't think one party will ever be able to criticize another for that without being hypocritical. Unfortunately, it's what Washington does, no matter who's in charge.
One's party affiliation might as well boil down to a decision on which entities they think are more worthy of being "greased" and which party does that greasing.
Moral equivalency. That's what the liberal American press says about the Hamas - Israel conflict. It has the same validity in a discussion of democrats - conservatives.
What? Again, who said anything about Israel? It does not have the same validity, because they're two totally different issues.
Do you mean: When republicans "grease vote-buying machines," it's less morally reprehensible than when democrats "grease vote-buying machines?"
Post a Comment